|
|
|
Organizing for Effort |
|
An
effort-based school replaces the assumption that aptitude determines
what and how much students learn with the belief that sustained and
directed effort can yield high achievement for all students. Everything
in the classroom experience is organized to send the message that
effort is expected and that tough problems yield to sustained work.
High minimum standards are set and assessments are geared to the
standards. GROUNDWORK FOR HIGH ACHIEVEMENT
| • |
Clear and high standards |
| • |
Curriculum aligned to standards |
| • |
Students responsible for their own work |
| • |
Time to meet standards | |
| |
|
|
| Clear Expectations |
|
|
High
expectations are communicated clearly in ways that become embedded in
the thinking of school professionals, parents, the community and, above
all, students themselves. Descriptive criteria and models of work that
meet standards are publicly displayed, and students refer to these
displays to analyze and discuss their work. COMMUNICATION AND CLARITY
| • |
Standards available and discussed |
| • |
Models of student work |
| • |
Students judge their own and others work |
| • |
Intermediate expectations satisfied |
| • |
Families and community informed | |
| |
|
|
 |
Fair and Credible Evaluations |
|
If
we expect students to put forth sustained effort over time, we need to
use assessments that students find fair. Fair evaluations are those for
which students can prepare: therefore, tests, exams, and classroom
assessments, as well as the curriculum, must be aligned to the
standards. Fair assessment also means grading against absolute
standards rather than on a curve, so students can clearly see the
results of their learning efforts. Assessments that meet these criteria
provide parents, colleges, and employers with credible evaluations of
what individual students know and can do. TRUE ASSESSMENT OF EFFORT AND KNOWLEDGE
| • |
Exams referenced to standards |
| • |
Curriculum and assessments aligned |
| • |
Grading against standards |
| • |
Reporting system that makes clear how students are progressing toward expected standards |
| • |
Public accountability systems and instructional assessments aligned |
|
| |
|
|
| Recognition of Accomplishment |
|
|
Clear
recognition of authentic accomplishment is a hallmark of an
effort-based school: this includes celebrations of work that meets
standards or intermediate progress benchmarks en route to the
standards. Progress points should be articulated so that, regardless of
entering performance level, every student can meet real accomplishment
criteria often enough to be recognized frequently. Student
accomplishment is also recognized when performance on standards-based
assessments is related to opportunities at work and in higher
education. CLEAR ILLUMINATION OF PROGRESS
| • |
Frequent recognition of student work |
| • |
Recognition for real accomplishments |
| • |
Clearly demarcated progress points |
| • |
Celebration with family and community |
| • |
Employers and colleges recognize accomplishments | |
| |
|
|
 |
Academic Rigor in a Thinking Curriculum |
|
Knowledge
and thinking are intimately joined. This implies a curriculum organized
around major academic concepts that students are expected to know
deeply. Teaching engages students in active reasoning about these
concepts. In every subject, at every grade level, instruction and
learning includes commitment to a knowledge core, high thinking demand,
and active use of knowledge. COMMITMENT TO A KNOWLEDGE CORE
| • |
An articulated curriculum that avoids needless repetition and progressively deepens concepts |
| • |
Curriculum and instruction organized around major concepts |
| • |
Teaching and assessment focus on mastery of core concepts | HIGH THINKING DEMAND
| • |
Students expected to raise questions, to solve problems, to reason |
| • |
Challenging assignments in every subject |
| • |
Extended projects |
| • |
Explanations and justification expected |
| • |
Reflection on learning strategies | ACTIVE USE OF KNOWLEDGE
| • |
Synthesize several sources of information |
| • |
Test understanding by applying and discussing concepts |
| • |
Apply prior knowledge |
| • |
Interpret texts and construct solutions | |
| |
|
|
| Accountable Talk |
|
|
For
classroom talk to promote learning it must be accountable to the
learning community, to accurate and appropriate knowledge, and to
rigorous thinking. ACCOUNTABILITY TO THE LEARNING COMMUNITY
| • |
Students actively participate in classroom talk |
| • |
Listen attentively |
| • |
Elaborate and build on each other's ideas |
| • |
Work to clarify or expand a proposition | ACCOUNTABILITY TO KNOWLEDGE
| • |
Specific and accurate knowledge |
| • |
Appropriate evidence for claims and arguments |
| • |
Commitment to getting it right | ACCOUNTABILITY TO RIGOROUS THINKING
| • |
Synthesize several sources of information |
| • |
Construct explanations and test understanding of concepts |
| • |
Formulate conjectures and hypotheses |
| • |
Employ generally accepted standards of reasoning |
| • |
Challenge the quality of evidence and reasoning | |
| |
|
 |
Socializing Intelligence |
|
Intelligence
is a set of problem-solving and reasoning capabilities joined with the
habits of mind that lead one to use those capabilities regularly. It is
also a set of beliefs about one's right and obligation to understand
and make sense of the world, and one's capacity to figure things out
over time. BELIEFS
| • |
I have the right and obligation to understand and make things work |
| • |
Problems can be analyzed and I am capable to analysis, ask questions, get information | SKILLS
| • |
A toolkit of problem-analysis skills (metacognitive strategies) and good intuition about when to use them |
| • |
Knowing how to ask questions, seek help, and get enough information to solve problems | DISPOSITIONS
| • |
Habits of mind |
| • |
Tendency to actively try to analyze problems, ask questions, get information | |
| |
|
| Self-management of Learning |
 |
Students are
responsible for the quality of their thinking and learning and develop
and use an array of self-monitoring and self-management strategies.
These metacognitive skills include noticing when one doesn't understand
something and taking steps to remedy the situation, as well as
formulating questions and inquiries that lead one to explore deep
levels of meaning. Students also manage their own learning by
evaluating the feedback they get from others; bringing their background
knowledge to bear on new learning; anticipating learning difficulties
and apportioning their time accordingly; and judging their progress
toward a learning goal. STUDENT LEARNING
| • |
Metacognitive strategies explicitly modeled, identified, discussed, and practiced |
| • |
Students play active role in monitoring and managing the quality of their learning |
| • |
Teachers scaffold student performance during initial learning; gradually remove supports |
| • |
Students become agents of their learning | |
| |
|
|
 |
Learning as Apprentice |
Apprenticeship
learning is brought into schooling by organizing learning environments
so that complex thinking is modeled and analyzed, and by providing
mentoring and coaching as students undertake extended projects and
develop presentations of finished work, both in and beyond the
classroom. KNOWLEDGE THROUGH EXPERIENCE
| • |
Students create authentic products and performances for interested, critical audiences |
| • |
Experts critique and guide student work |
| • |
Finished work meets public standards of quality |
| • |
Learning strategies are modeled | |